Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Quality over Quantity: The Characters of The Road

Well, here it is, my first blog post.

I was very eager to throw myself into the deep abyss of confusion and critical-thinking, that is a fresh, so-called (to be determined by your's truly) AP merit novel.  As I turned to the first page and began my adventure, I thought back to some of the prevalent themes in the novels we had previously read in class.  Because I understood that the plot of this novel was about a father and a son traveling a scorched earth and navigating the dangers of a new life, with no hesitation I remembered the thematic idea of the need for human connection.  My prediction: as the storyline progresses, as I travel further down The Road, this concept will become the pinnacle of this story...that is, human connection is responsible for the characters' survival.

Personally, when I begin reading a new book, the most challenging part is keeping all of the different characters straight.  As you can imagine, Toni Morrison's Song of Solomon was a formidable endeavor with the vast amount of characters and personalities to keep in order.  Not to mention three characters were all given the same name (thank heavens for Ruth's prolonged breastfeeding).  The Road, on the other hand, is not flashy with its extent of meaningful character foils and symbolic lines of lineage; it initially boasts only two characters, a father, and a son.

The father, let's call him Papa, is struggling to survive a barren environment, scarred by fire, with his son, we'll call him "the boy".  As a reader, I can relate to these characters because much like them, I am in the dark when it comes to understanding their situation: how they got there, what it was like before, and if there is salvation?  Most of the characterization of Papa and the boy is derived from the dialogue that they share, or flashbacks illustrated through the eyes of Papa.

Papa wants to survive.  He wants to keep living and overcome the challenges that have been thrown their way.  His motive?  His son.  When asked by his son "what would you do if I died", Papa responded that "if you died I would want to die too" (11).  The only reason Papa has continued to look out for himself and fight the harsh environment is to protect his son.  "The boy was all that stood between him and death" (29).  In a flashback, Papa relives the moment when his wife had decided to leave him and his son to escape the painful world by means of suicide.  In this flashback, death is personified.  His wife has "taken a new lover [Death]" (57).  This conversation with his wife speaks to his chief value: death is not the answer, life is.  Because of his experiences with his wife, he becomes defensive when his son says that he wishes he was dead.  The major conflict that faces Papa is, as one could infer from the above background, death.  Death has taken much from him; his friends, his wife, and safety.  Papa (along with much of his surroundings) is associated with the color gray, which represents loss and depression.  Tormented by the loss he has experienced, he warns his son that "you forget what you want to remember and you remember what you want to forget" (12).  An eloquent chiasmus, Papa is haunted by his past and is protecting his son in order to find solace.  Papa takes extreme measures to protect his son from the harsh environment and the brutal gangs.  He uses one of his last two bullets on a man that has his son's neck to the blade of a knife.  His son is the last thing he could possibly lose, and with the ash as "gray as his heart", losing his son would force him to slip into the darkness that blankets the world (27).

The boy is primarily characterized by dialogue.  He is frightened, naïve, and inquisitive.  Through a conversation between Papa and his wife, it can be reasonably inferred that the boy was born into the world that was starting to slip away.  Unlike his father, the barren landscape of ash and dust is the only world he has known.  So one can imagine the immense questioning this child has the propensity for.  The inquisitive nature of the boy highlights how he does not quite understand the situation he and his father are in.  When his father and him come upon a man, who had seemingly been struck by lightning, the boy presses his father to help the man in any way he could.  The boy asks repeatedly, "cant we help him Papa?"..."cant we help him Papa?" (50).  The father knows that under their circumstances, there is nothing that can be done to aid the man, but the boy is unable to see the world through the eyes of his father.  Another example of the naivety of the boy is when they find a relatively nice place by a river.  The boy pleas to his father to stay for one more day, but the father knows that losing time brings them both closer to death.  In summary, the boy is naïve, and is yet to realize that he and his father are all each other have.

BLOG TWIST:  Even though I stated earlier that there are only two characters, in my opinion, there are actually three.  Some would say I lied to you in my opening remarks about how many characters were present in the novel, but I just call it alternative facts.  Anyways, can you guess the third character?  The wife you say?  No, guess again!  Death?  Correct!

*gasp*

But how can Death be a character when it is an abstract, intangible concept?  McCarthy personifies Death to a point where it becomes the antagonist of the story.  The main characters, Papa and his son, have one goal, to survive and continue southwards.  Their only opposition?  Death.  Death is as pervasive as the ash that settles in the remote areas of the dark land the main characters are surviving in.  Death calls to the characters, primarily Papa in his dreams.  It tempts him with "dreams so rich in color.  How else would Death call you?" (21).  The fantasies and memories of what life used to be are Death's way of reaching out and touching the characters.  Death is closely associated with the gray ash that covers the land and swallows the light of the sun, inescapable.  The protagonists, Papa and the boy, will need to overcome the antagonist.  According to my prediction at the beginning of this post, the power of human connection will help our characters triumph over Death.

5 comments:

  1. When you redefine your understanding of what makes a "character" (making room for "death" to be the antagonist), you open up a whole new way to see this novel. Great. Have you read Dylan Thomas' poem "Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night?" You might think about it as you read. You can find it here: https://www.poets.org/poetsorg/poem/do-not-go-gentle-good-night

    ReplyDelete

  2. It’s interesting, we got very different understandings of the meaning of the color gray in the context of papa. I certainly see the depressing side of it, but I think the color black is associated more with loss and the color of ash. I’d be curious to hear what you think of some of my ideas about color.
    I see how the principle of human connection applies to the close relationship between the father and the son, but how do you see this applying to other people in the novel, such as the roaming gangs? Despite being depicted as evil, they are also triumphing over death. Anyways, great insights into the characters. The depiction of death as a character is clever and certainly fits the novel.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like the conversational approach you take to your post, as well as the links you make to other novels. While "The Road" (which I can't italicize, so quotes will have to do) is very different from the novels we've read so far, there certainly are links to be made as well.

    Your analysis of characters' motivations is also thoughtful.

    To add on to Aidan's comment: I wonder if survival is worth it without retaining one's dignity or humanity? This might be one way to consider the gangs in the novel as compared to the father and the son.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nice analyzation of the characters. I was scared of doing that first because I was worried that there might be a big event near the end of the novel, changing my whole perspective of them. I thought that you nailed "Papa" but thought that you might have wanted to consider talking about how he seems to almost have two completely different personalities. On one hand, hes the most loving and protective father, and on the other, he doesn't give any care in the world about others, granted it is every man for himself in the wasteland. I just thought that it was interesting because he kinda turns into the man that he is trying to protect his son from, a scavenger with the ability to kill in order to survive. But overall I thought you did to great job.

    ReplyDelete
  5. In terms of the dialogue, do you think that the dialogue is too simple to draw sufficient insight into your characters? You drew direct insight talking about the boy being naive, and I completely agree, but I wish the dialogue between them would be more complex. Maybe McCarthy is going for the simple dialogue and scenes to highlight how the father and the boy don't take those for granted. I'd love to hear from both you and Aidan about what McCarthy is doing in terms of the dialogue, because I don't think I completely understand it.

    As Aidan said, your idea of death as a character is very interesting. In my blog I talked about how the depiction of the man they saw was relatively similar to the descriptions of the scorched terrain. McCarthy is definitely using personification and constantly developing and returning to these descriptions. Due to the focus on descriptions of the terrain, and the figurative language being used, do you think there is evidence to suggest that the terrain is more of a character than death? There's probably a great deal of overlap considering there's evidence to suggest the environment is the antagonist for the novel, but I just wanted to hear your thoughts.

    ReplyDelete